Depression and the Chemical Imbalance Myth: What Science Really Says

TL;DR

The popular belief that depression is caused by a chemical imbalance, particularly a serotonin deficiency, is not supported by current scientific evidence. Depression is a complex condition with psychological, social, and biological contributors. While antidepressants can be helpful for many, the chemical imbalance theory oversimplifies the condition and may influence stigma and treatment expectations in unhelpful ways.

Key Takeaways

• There is no strong empirical support for the idea that depression is caused by a serotonin or chemical imbalance.

• Depression is better understood as a multifactorial condition involving psychological, biological, and social factors.

• The chemical imbalance narrative remains widespread in public and clinical settings despite scientific critiques.

• This belief can both reduce self-blame and inadvertently increase stigma or pessimism about recovery.

Introduction

For decades, the “chemical imbalance” theory has been one of the most widely accepted explanations for depression. The idea suggests that low levels of neurotransmitters—like serotonin—are the root cause of depressive symptoms. It is a simple, memorable explanation that has permeated advertising, education, and even some clinical practice. But is it scientifically accurate? Mounting evidence says no.

Scientific Consensus and Evidence

Lack of Empirical Support

Research reviews have consistently failed to find conclusive evidence that depression is directly caused by a chemical imbalance. As Ang, Horowitz, and Moncrieff (2022) note, the theory of a serotonin deficit is more of a cultural narrative than a scientific conclusion. Similarly, Lacasse and Leo (2015) argue that the popular chemical imbalance hypothesis lacks robust empirical backing.

Complex Causes

Depression is now seen as a multifactorial disorder. Psychological factors like trauma or chronic stress, social factors like isolation or poverty, and biological elements such as genetics all contribute. No single neurotransmitter abnormality has been reliably linked to depression (Castrén, 2005; Leistedt & Linkowski, 2013).

Brain Networks and Plasticity

Recent research focuses on how brain networks and neuroplasticity affect mood and behavior. Antidepressants may work by enhancing neural connectivity rather than simply increasing serotonin levels (Castrén, 2005).

Public and Clinical Beliefs

Widespread but Misleading

Despite scientific uncertainty, the chemical imbalance model remains common in public messaging and among healthcare providers (Ang et al., 2022; Schroder et al., 2025). Surveys show many people continue to believe depression stems from faulty brain chemistry.

Impact on Treatment and Stigma

This belief has a dual impact. On the one hand, it may reduce self-blame. On the other, it can promote a sense of hopelessness and dependency on medication. It may also increase social stigma, as people view depression as a fixed, biological flaw (Kemp et al., 2014; Schroder et al., 2020).

Conclusion

The chemical imbalance theory of depression is outdated and unsupported by current scientific research. Depression is far more complex, shaped by a wide range of psychological, social, and biological factors. Clinging to oversimplified models may hinder more nuanced understanding, effective treatment, and compassionate care.

References

Ang, B., Horowitz, M., & Moncrieff, J. (2022). SSM - Mental Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmmh.2022.100098

Schroder, H., et al. (2020). Journal of Affective Disorders, 276, 537-545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.061

Lacasse, J., & Leo, J. (2015). Behavior Therapy, 38.

Castrén, E. (2005). Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 241-246. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1629

Kemp, J., et al. (2014). Behaviour Research and Therapy, 56, 47-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2014.02.009

Schultz, W., & Hunter, N. (2016). Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 28, 159 - 173. https://doi.org/10.1080/08952833.2016.1235523

Lysaker, P., & Robinson, R. (2007). Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38, 411-420. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.38.4.411

Deacon, B., & Baird, G. (2009). Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28, 415-435. https://doi.org/10.1521/JSCP.2009.28.4.415

Schroder, H., et al. (2025). Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1469913

Leo, J., & Lacasse, J. (2008). Society, 45, 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12115-007-9047-3

Murphy, M., et al. (2021). Social Work in Mental Health, 20, 350 - 375. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332985.2021.2017387

Acker, J., & Warner, L. (2020). Social Work in Mental Health, 18, 237 - 256. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332985.2019.1700872

Schroder, H., et al. (2022). Journal of American College Health, 72, 1993 - 2000. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2022.2098037

Leistedt, S., & Linkowski, P. (2013). European Neuropsychopharmacology, 23, 55-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2012.10.011

Blease, C. (2013). Journal of Medical Ethics, 40, 225 - 229. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-101122

Pereira, J., et al. (2020). Annual Review of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011613

(2021). Journal of Clinical Review & Case Reports. https://doi.org/10.33140/jcrc.06.09.04

Speerforck, S., et al. (2014). Journal of Affective Disorders, 168, 224-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.06.013